🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.